You are viewing archived content

Please note that this page is a static copy of a previously published web page and is no longer actively maintained.
Be aware that the information contained here may be out-of-date.
For the most recent information, we recommend visiting the main website of the EMCDDA.

Figure GPS-21. Trends in last 12 months prevalence of ecstasy use among young adults (aged 15–34)

Part (ii) Countries with three or more surveys

Year	Bulgaria	Czech Republic	Denmark	Germany	Estonia	Ireland	Spain	France	Italy	Latvia	Hungary	Netherlands	Poland	Slovakia	Finland	Sweden	UK (E&W)	Norway
Related links:
1993
1994																	2.1
1995				2.1			2.5
1996																	3.5
1997				1.9			1.6
1998					1.0							1.8		2.0	0.4	0.0	3.1
1999							1.7	0.4										1.2
2000			1.2	1.6				0.5						2.6	0.8	0.4	4.1
2001							3.8		0.3		1.4	2.3					4.5
2002		5.9						0.8					0.5	2.0	1.3		4.3
2003				1.9	3.7	2.3	2.9		0.7	1.9	2.6						4.1
2004		7.7												3.1	1.5		3.7	1.2
2005	1.1		0.9					1.0	0.7			2.7					3.4
2006				1.2			2.5						0.7	2.7	1.3		3.9
2007	1.4					2.4				2.7	1.0						3.1
2008	1.6	7.7	1.1		2.3		2.3		1.0							0.2	3.9
2009		2.8		1.0			1.8										3.2	0.6
2010		1.6	0.8					0.4					3.1	0.9	1.1		3
2011		2.5				0.9	1.4			0.8							2.8
Statistical bulletin 2008: Figure GPS-21 part (ii)
Statistical bulletin 2009: Figure GPS-21 part (ii)
Statistical bulletin 2010: Figure GPS-21 part (ii)
Statistical bulletin 2011: Figure GPS-21 part (ii)
Statistical bulletin 2012: Figure GPS-21 part (ii)
See also Table GPS-0
Sample sizes (respondents) for the 15 to 34 age group for each country and year are presented in Table GPS-8 part ii
See also 'General notes for interpreting data' on the Explanatory notes and help page

Notes:

Data taken from national surveys available in each country. Figures and methodology for each survey can be consulted in Table GPS-8 part ii.

For young adults, the EMCDDA uses the range 15 to 34 years (Denmark and the UK from 16 years, Germany, Estonia (1998) and Hungary from 18 years).

The most recent general population survey reported by the Netherlands display a wide variation in results compared with 2005 which may reflect methodological differences.

The most recent general population survey reported by Italy display a wide variation in results compared with the previous surveys which may reflect methodological differences. The data is provided for information, but given the lack of comparability between surveys should be treated with caution.

Sources:

Reitox national reports 2012, taken from population surveys, reports or scientific articles.

Year	1993	1994	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011
Bulgaria													1.1		1.4	1.6
Czech Republic										5.9		7.7				7.7	2.8	1.6	2.5
Denmark								1.2					0.9			1.1		0.8
Germany			2.1		1.9			1.6			1.9			1.2			1.0
Estonia						1.0					3.7					2.3
Ireland											2.3				2.4				0.9
Spain			2.5		1.6		1.7		3.8		2.9			2.5		2.3	1.8		1.4
France							0.4	0.5		0.8			1.0					0.4
Italy									0.3		0.7		0.7			1.0
Latvia											1.9				2.7				0.8
Hungary									1.4		2.6				1.0
Netherlands						1.8			2.3				2.7
Poland										0.5				0.7				3.1
Slovakia						2.0		2.6		2.0		3.1		2.7				0.9
Finland						0.4		0.8		1.3		1.5		1.3				1.1
Sweden						0.0		0.4								0.2
UK (E&W)		2.1		3.5		3.1		4.1	4.5	4.3	4.1	3.7	3.4	3.9	3.1	3.9	3.2	3	2.8
Norway							1.2					1.2					0.6

gpsfig21b

Demonstration	Reference	Type	Y Axis	X axis	Label	Width (%)	Height (px)	Y plotline	Y min,max values	series Markers
	szrfig1	column,column,line	Quantity (kg)\|Number of seizures$3
	szrfig2	column,column,line	Quantity (kg)\|Number of seizures$3
	gpsfig4a	line	%				500		0,30
	gpsfig1	column	%				500		0,25
	gpsfig2	column,column,point	Contiuation rates %\|LTP all adults$3						0,
	gpsfig18a	distribution	Estimated prevalence (%)						0
	gpsfig18b	distribution	Estimated prevalence (%)						0
	gpsfig20	column	%				600		0,20
	dlofig2	stackedBar	%				600
	dlofig3	line	Index (2006 = 100)			68
	dlofig3$	pie			1 135 701 reports (2011)	30
	dlofig4	line	Index (2006 = 100)			68
	dlofig4$	pie			915 541 reports (2011)	30
	dlofig5	line	Index (2006 = 100)			68
	dlofig5$	pie			179 418 reports (2011)	30
	drdfig12a	scatter	Ratio between DRD in 2003 and 2000	Number of DRD in 2000				1
	drdfig12b	scatter	Ratio between DRD in 2010/11 and 2003	Number of DRD in 2003				1
	hsrfig2	stackedColumn	Clients in substitution treatment
	dlofig1	line	Index (2006 = 100)						60,180
	drdfig1	column	Country and total number of DRD				600
	drdfig2	column	Proportion of DRD under the age of 25 (%)				600
	drdfig3	line	Mean age in years
	drdfig4	line	Mean age in years
	drdfig5a	line	Index (1990 = 100)
	drdfig5b	line	Index (1996 = 100)
	drdfig6	line	Index (1990 = 100 %)						80,160
	drdfig7a	column	Mortality rate per million
	drdfig7b	column,point	Rate per million
	drdfig8	line	Index (1985 = 100 %)						50,650
	drdfig9a	line	%						0,70
	drdfig9b	line	%
	drdfig9c	line	%
	drdfig10	column	Mean age in years				500
	drdfig11a	line	Index						0,300
	drdfig11b	line	Index
	drdfig11c	line	Index
	drdfig13a	line	Number of cases
	drdfig13b	line	Number of cases
	eyefig1a	line
	eyefig1b	line
	eyefig1c	line							0,
	eyefig1d	line	%			45	800
	eyefig1d$	line	%			45	800
	gpsfig3	column	%				500
	gpsfig4b	line	%
	gpsfig5	column	%
	gpsfig6	column	%
	gpsfig7	column	%
	gpsfig8a	line	%						0,
	gpsfig8b	line	%						0,
	gpsfig9a	column	%
	gpsfig9b	column	%
	gpsfig10	line	%
	gpsfig11	column,column,point	Continuation rates (%)\| LTP All adults$3
	gpsfig12a	line	%						0,
	gpsfig12b	line	%						0,
	gpsfig13	column,column,point	%
	gpsfig14a	line	%						0,
	gpsfig14b	line	%						0,
	gpsfig15	column	%
	gpsfig16	column,column,point	Continuation rates (%)\|LTP All adults$3						0,
	gpsfig17	column	%
	gpsfig21a	line	%						0,
	gpsfig21b	line	%						0,
	gpsfig22	column,column,point	Continuation rates (%)\| LTP All adults$3
	gpsfig23a	line	%
	gpsfig23b	line	%
	gpsfig23c	line	%
	gpsfig23d	line	%						0,
	gpsfig23e	line	%						0,
	hsrfig4	pie			% of prison population in OST	30
	inffig1a	line	New AIDS cases per million population				700		0,
	inffig1b	line	New AIDS cases per million population				700		0,
	inffig2a	line	Cases per million population						0,
	inffig2b	line	Cases per million population						0,
	inffig2c	line	Cases per million population
	inffig2d	line	Cases per million population
	inffig3a	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig3b	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig3c	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig6a	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig6b	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig6c	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig9a	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig9b	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	pppfig1	line	Index (2005 = 100)
	pppfig2	line	Index (2005 = 100)
	tdifig1a	line	%
	tdifig1b	line
	tdifig2a	pie				30
	tdifig2b	pie				50
	tdifig3a	line	%
	tdifig3b	line
	tdifig7	line	%			60			0,
	tdifig7$	stackedColumn	Numbers			38			0,50000
	hsrfig1b	stackedColumn	%































Distirbuted points with specific markers and colours	inffig6a	distribution	%							National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)

Download spreadsheet version (.xls)