You are viewing archived content

Please note that this page is a static copy of a previously published web page and is no longer actively maintained.
Be aware that the information contained here may be out-of-date.
For the most recent information, we recommend visiting the main website of the EMCDDA.

Figure INF-9. Prevalence of markers of HBV infection among injecting drug users: studies with national and sub-national coverage

Part (i) Percentage ever infected (positive for aHBc), 2010–11

Country	year	National		Sub-national
Related links:
Malta	2011	1.2
Turkey	2010	4
Estonia	2010			5
Slovenia	2011	8.1
Austria	2011	10.3		10.4	33.3	47.8	0
United Kingdom	2011			15.9	10.1
Slovakia	2011			21.5
Sweden	2010	23.4
Germany	2011			16.3	33
Greece	2011	32.3	21.6	14	40.3	29.7	47.2	22.8	15.8	20.2	16.2	13.3	37.8	10.2	17.2	22.6
Netherlands	2011			31.6
Norway	2011			33.1
Italy	2010	33.9		53.1	8.5	21.7	24.8	11.1	29.1	46.6	50.7	28.8	22.1	19.5	67	39.1	47.6	38.3	31.6	42.4	33.4
Belgium	2011			55.1	16.7
Portugal	2010/2011	81.5	24.0
Latvia	2011			65.4
Poland
Lithuania
Bulgaria
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Finland
France
Hungary
Ireland
Luxembourg
Croatia
Romania
Spain
Denmark
https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/stats13/inffig9a: Figure INF-09 part (i).
For primary sources, study details and data before 2010, see Table INF-115 and Table INF-0.
See also 'General notes for interpreting data' on the Explanatory notes and help page

Notes:

Dark squares are samples with national coverage; blue triangle are samples with sub-national (including local or regional) coverage.

Differences between countries have to be interpreted with caution owing to different types of settings and/or study methods; national sampling strategies vary.

Countries are presented by order of increasing prevalence, based on the average of national data or, if not available, of subnational data.

* Italy provided a national estimate for 2010 only, even though regional data for 2011 were provided for many regions, but not for all (i.e. Liguria and Lombardia). So regional data for 2010 and not for 2011 are presented here as well for comparability reasons

Sources:

<a/ href="https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/about/partners/reitox-network">Reitox Network<a/>

Country	Malta	Turkey	Slovenia	Austria	United Kingdom	Slovakia	Sweden	Germany	Greece	Netherlands	Norway	Italy	Belgium	Portugal	Latvia
National	1.2	4	8.1	10.3			23.4		32.3			33.9		81.5
National									21.6					24.0

Subnational				10.4	15.9	21.5		16.3	14	31.6	33.1	53.1	55.1		65.4
Subnational				33.3	10.1			33	40.3			8.5	16.7
Subnational				47.8					29.7			21.7
Subnational				0					47.2			24.8
Subnational									22.8			11.1
Subnational									15.8			29.1
Subnational									20.2			46.6
Subnational									16.2			50.7
Subnational									13.3			28.8
Subnational									37.8			22.1
Subnational									10.2			19.5
Subnational									17.2			67
Subnational									22.6			39.1
Subnational												47.6
Subnational												38.3
Subnational												31.6
Subnational												42.4
Subnational												33.4

inffig9a

Demonstration	Reference	Type	Y Axis	X axis	Label	Width (%)	Height (px)	Y plotline	Y min,max values	series Markers
	szrfig1	column,column,line	Quantity (kg)\|Number of seizures$3
	szrfig2	column,column,line	Quantity (kg)\|Number of seizures$3
	gpsfig4a	line	%				500		0,30
	gpsfig1	column	%				500		0,25
	gpsfig2	column,column,point	Contiuation rates %\|LTP all adults$3						0,
	gpsfig18a	distribution	Estimated prevalence (%)						0
	gpsfig18b	distribution	Estimated prevalence (%)						0
	gpsfig20	column	%				600		0,20
	dlofig2	stackedBar	%				600
	dlofig3	line	Index (2006 = 100)			68
	dlofig3$	pie			1 135 701 reports (2011)	30
	dlofig4	line	Index (2006 = 100)			68
	dlofig4$	pie			915 541 reports (2011)	30
	dlofig5	line	Index (2006 = 100)			68
	dlofig5$	pie			179 418 reports (2011)	30
	drdfig12a	scatter	Ratio between DRD in 2003 and 2000	Number of DRD in 2000				1
	drdfig12b	scatter	Ratio between DRD in 2010/11 and 2003	Number of DRD in 2003				1
	hsrfig2	stackedColumn	Clients in substitution treatment
	dlofig1	line	Index (2006 = 100)						60,180
	drdfig1	column	Country and total number of DRD				600
	drdfig2	column	Proportion of DRD under the age of 25 (%)				600
	drdfig3	line	Mean age in years
	drdfig4	line	Mean age in years
	drdfig5a	line	Index (1990 = 100)
	drdfig5b	line	Index (1996 = 100)
	drdfig6	line	Index (1990 = 100 %)						80,160
	drdfig7a	column	Mortality rate per million
	drdfig7b	column,point	Rate per million
	drdfig8	line	Index (1985 = 100 %)						50,650
	drdfig9a	line	%						0,70
	drdfig9b	line	%
	drdfig9c	line	%
	drdfig10	column	Mean age in years				500
	drdfig11a	line	Index						0,300
	drdfig11b	line	Index
	drdfig11c	line	Index
	drdfig13a	line	Number of cases
	drdfig13b	line	Number of cases
	eyefig1a	line
	eyefig1b	line
	eyefig1c	line							0,
	eyefig1d	line	%			45	800
	eyefig1d$	line	%			45	800
	gpsfig3	column	%				500
	gpsfig4b	line	%
	gpsfig5	column	%
	gpsfig6	column	%
	gpsfig7	column	%
	gpsfig8a	line	%						0,
	gpsfig8b	line	%						0,
	gpsfig9a	column	%
	gpsfig9b	column	%
	gpsfig10	line	%
	gpsfig11	column,column,point	Continuation rates (%)\| LTP All adults$3
	gpsfig12a	line	%						0,
	gpsfig12b	line	%						0,
	gpsfig13	column,column,point	%
	gpsfig14a	line	%						0,
	gpsfig14b	line	%						0,
	gpsfig15	column	%
	gpsfig16	column,column,point	Continuation rates (%)\|LTP All adults$3						0,
	gpsfig17	column	%
	gpsfig21a	line	%						0,
	gpsfig21b	line	%						0,
	gpsfig22	column,column,point	Continuation rates (%)\| LTP All adults$3
	gpsfig23a	line	%
	gpsfig23b	line	%
	gpsfig23c	line	%
	gpsfig23d	line	%						0,
	gpsfig23e	line	%						0,
	hsrfig4	pie			% of prison population in OST	30
	inffig1a	line	New AIDS cases per million population				700		0,
	inffig1b	line	New AIDS cases per million population				700		0,
	inffig2a	line	Cases per million population						0,
	inffig2b	line	Cases per million population						0,
	inffig2c	line	Cases per million population
	inffig2d	line	Cases per million population
	inffig3a	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig3b	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig3c	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig6a	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig6b	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig6c	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig9a	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	inffig9b	distribution	%						0,	National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)
	pppfig1	line	Index (2005 = 100)
	pppfig2	line	Index (2005 = 100)
	tdifig1a	line	%
	tdifig1b	line
	tdifig2a	pie				30
	tdifig2b	pie				50
	tdifig3a	line	%
	tdifig3b	line
	tdifig7	line	%			60			0,
	tdifig7$	stackedColumn	Numbers			38			0,50000
	hsrfig1b	stackedColumn	%































Distirbuted points with specific markers and colours	inffig6a	distribution	%							National;Subnational\|square;rgba(0,0,0,0.8);triangle;rgba(0,0,255,0.8)

Download spreadsheet version (.xls)