You are viewing archived content
Please note that this page is a static copy of a previously published web page and is no longer actively maintained.
Be aware that the information contained here may be out-of-date.
For the most recent information, we recommend visiting the main website of the EMCDDA.
Table PDU-6. Estimated trends in the prevalence of problem and injecting drug use, 2006–11 (rate per 1 000 population aged 15–64): Combined estimates per country
Part (i) Estimated trends of overall problem drug use
| Country | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Drug use [1] | Method [1] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Republic | 4.13 | 4.20 | 4.39 | 5.04 | 5.30 | 5.51 | PDU | TM |
| Germany * | 3.30 | 3.30 | 3.96 | 3.71 | 4.06 | PDU | TM | |
| Greece | 2.70 | 2.73 | 2.68 | 3.19 | 2.99 | 2.72 | POU | CR |
| France*** | 6.90 | 7.90 | PDU | CM | ||||
| Italy | : | : | 9.80 | 9.95 | : | PDU | TM | |
| Cyprus | 1.50 | 3.66 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 1.54 | 2.09 | PDU | TP |
| Luxembourg | 7.70 | 6.16 | PDU | OT | ||||
| Latvia | 4,65* | : | : | : | 12.30 | 9.49 | PDU | TM |
| Malta | 5.40 | : | : | : | 6.07 | 7.47 | POU | CR |
| Austria | 4.50 | 4.14 | 4.38 | 5,9** | 5.90 | 5.30 | POU | CR |
| Slovakia | 4.90 | 4.70 | 2.68 | : | : | PDU | OT | |
| United Kingdom | 10.19 | 10.10 | : | 9.79 | 9.38 | PDU | CM |
Notes:
Data represents a selection based on the availability of the same estimation method over time. In some countries more estimates might be available. In other countries data are insufficient to report.
Target groups may vary between countries owing to different methods and data sources; therefore comparisons should be made with caution.
The original age range for Malta in 2006 is 12 to 64 years old. There has been a significant change in data provision in Slovakia in 2008 and trend information is corrupted.
[1] - POU = Problem opioid use; PSU = Problem stimulant use; IDU = Injecting drug use; PDU = Problem drug use. TM = Treatment Multiplier ; HM = HIV Multiplier ; MM = Mortality Multiplier ; MI = Multivariate Indicator Method ; PM = Police Multiplier ; TP = Truncated Poisson ; CM = Combined Methods. CR = Capture Recapture, OT = Other Methods.
* The figure shown is based on average between the lower and upper bound of prevalence estimate.
**2009 estimates have been updated since last year's report
***France: For both years, two estimates are provided. The results given here is the average of the two estimates (for 2011, there were 3 estimates but arrest data were excluded as suggested in the national report)
Sources:
2013 REITOX National Reports - Fonte PDU template