You are viewing archived content

Please note that this page is a static copy of a previously published web page and is no longer actively maintained.
Be aware that the information contained here may be out-of-date.
For the most recent information, we recommend visiting the main website of the EMCDDA.

Table TDI-17. Route of administration by primary drug of clients entering treatment, 2011 or most recent year available

Part (ix) New cannabis outpatient clients by country and usual route of administration (%)

Country		Inject	Smoke/inhale	Eat/drink	Sniff	Others	Route known (n)	Route unknown
Belgium		0.1	98.8	0.8	0.2	0.1	926	14
Bulgaria		0.0	100.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	7	0
Czech Republic		0.0	99.7	0.0	0.3	0.0	324	0
Denmark		0.0	98.2	1.8	0.0	0.0	942	89
Germany		0.2	98.4	1.1	0.2	0.2	12263	:
Estonia		:	100.0	:	:	:	19	:
Ireland	1	0.0	99.2	0.8	0.0	0.0	846	1
Greece		0.0	99.8	0.2	0.0	0.0	456	5
Spain	1	0.0	97.0	2.1	0.5	0.4	8504	149
France		:	99.4	0.5	:	0.0	6490	349
Italy	2	0.0	96.4	0.6	2.8	0.2	5316	465
Cyprus		0.0	99.7	0.3	0.0	0.0	310	1
Latvia	3	1.4	98.6	0.0	0.0	0.0	69	4
Lithuania		:	44.4	55.6	:	:	9	:
Luxembourg		:	:	:	:	:	:	:
Hungary		0.1	94.8	4.1	0.8	0.2	2073	15
Malta		:	97.4	2.6	:	:	38	:
Netherlands		0.0	99.6	0.2	0.1	0.0	2840	1194
Austria		0.0	97.4	1.9	0.6	0.2	534	13
Poland	4	:	98.8	:	1.2	:	81	:
Portugal	5	0.0	98.5	1.5	0.0	0.0	329	128
Romania		0.0	96.7	3.3	0.0	0.0	60	0
Slovenia		:	100.0	:	:	:	39	:
Slovakia		1.9	93.4	0.9	3.8	0.0	106	0
Finland		0.0	98.6	1.4	0.0	0.0	69	0
Sweden	1	0.0	96.3	3.3	0.3	0.0	575	10
United Kingdom	6	0.0	95.9	2.9	0.6	0.5	14067	374
Croatia		0.0	100.0	0.0	0.0	:	576	0
Turkey		:	:	:	:	:	:	:
Norway		:	:	:	:	:	:	:
Total		0.1	97.5	1.6	0.6	0.3	57868	2811

Notes:

: Indicates no data are available.

Percentages are of clients whose route of administration is known (n)

1 - Data are from 2010.

2 - In 2010 around 27% of all clients and 32% of new clients were registered as not known / missing for the primary drug category. Caution should be made when comparing data over time.

3 - In 2010 Latvia submitted a new dataset with a more precise TDI EMCDDA definition. Caution should be made when comparing data with previous years.

4 - Data are from 2010. Data presented in the table come from TDI pilot project. Caution should be made when interpreting the data.

5 - In 2010 came into implementation a new national information system implying methodological changes particularly in the registration criteria. Caution should be made when comparing 2010 data with previous years.

6 - Data are from 1st of April 2010 to 31st March 2011.

For more information relative to the treatment centre type, please see Table TDI-7.

See also 'General notes for interpreting data' on the Explanatory notes and help page.

Source:

Reitox national reports 2012 — TDI — outpatient treatment centres.

Download spreadsheet version (.xls)